Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1280 Download : 1100

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

A year has passed since the celebration of 100th years of Indonesian archaeology. On June 14th 2013, this golden moment was commemorated by institutions and individuals. The nostalgic euphoria has been transformed into the festive spirit of various events. Ranging from seminars to exhibitions. From small gatherings to the colosal stages. There is a pride that rised from the establishment of this 100th anniversary. This article tries to discuss the current situation in the Indonesian archaeology by dissect the anatomy of archaeological research in the Moluccas Archipleago. The ideas disscussed will cover the review of archaeological research in the Moluccas historically; followed by observing the recent activities  to understand the impacts of archaeological research for the region and its communities; and finally initiate the discussion on choosing the direction and the role of archaeological research for the academic and social purpose in the near future.


Tak terasa hampir setahun telah dilewati sejak perayaan satu abad purbakala Nusantara. Tepat tanggal 14 Juni 2013 silam, momentum emas ini diperingati segenap insan arkeologi Indonesia. Gempita nostalgia dikemas menjadi semangat perayaan dalam berbagai kegiatan. Mulai dari seminar sampai pameran. Sekedar sukuran hingga pentas kolosal. Ada kebanggaan yang membuncah dari angka mapan usia ke-100. Kini pesta telah usai. Segalanya kembali senyap.  Rasanya tepat untuk mulai merenung. Tentang makna menjadi lembaga dengan umur yang bahkan lebih sepuh dari negara. Memikirkan kembali kiprah pun capaian. Menemukenali kekurangan dan kendala. Adakah arkeologi akan terus mengalir dengan wawasan klasik business as usual? Ataukah memilih bercermin pada jernih kondisi kekinian dan bergegas membenahi diri? Makalah ini mencoba mengamati kondisi terkini arkeologi nasional dengan membedah anatomi penelitian arkeologi di Kepulauan Maluku dalam kerangka kronologis. Alur gagasan yang dibahas mencakup tinjauan atas rekam historis penelitian yang membentuk wajah arkeologi Maluku; dilanjutkan dengan mengamati aktivitas masa kini guna melihat aktualisasi studi arkeologi bagi kemajuan wilayah dan masyarakat; serta membuka ruang diskusi tentang memilih arah dan menentukan peran penelitian arkeologi bagi tujuan akademis dan sosial di masa mendatang.

Keywords

Arkeologi Arah dan Peran Penelitian Maluku

Article Details

Kapata Arkeologi by Balai Arkeologi Maluku. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at Copyright Notice.

How to Cite
Ririmasse, M. N. (2015). Abad Baru Purbakala: Memilih Arah Menentukan Peran Penelitian Arkeologi di Maluku. Kapata Arkeologi, 11(2), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.24832/kapata.v11i2.288

References

  1. Arifin, Karina dan Philippe Delanghe. (2004). Rock art in West Papua, Italia: UNESCO.
  2. Ballard, C. (1988). Dudumahan: A rock art site on Kai Kecil, Southeast Mollucas. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association, 8, 139-161.
  3. Bellwood, Peter. (2000). Prasejarah kepulauan Indo-Malaysia. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  4. Bulmer, S dan Bulmer, R. (1964). The prehistory of the Australian New Guinea Highlands. J. B. Watson (Ed.) New Guinea: the Central Highlands, 39-76. American Anthropologist 66.4, Part 2 Special Publication.
  5. Ellen, R. F dan Glover, I. C. Pottery Manufacture and Trade in the Central Moluccas, Indonesia: the Modern Situation and the Historical Implications. Man n.s, 9, 353-379.
  6. Flannery, T. and White, P. (1991). Animal Translocations. National Geographic Research and Exploration 7, 96-113.
  7. Gelpke, S. (1994). The report of Miguel Roxo de Brito of his voyage in 1581-2 to Raja Ampat, the MacCluer Gulf and Seram. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, 150, 123-145.
  8. Heinsohn, T.E. (2010). Marsupial as introduced species: Long–term anthropogenic expansion of the marsupial frontier and its implications for zoogeographic interpretation. Terra Austrialis 32: Altered Ecologies: Fire, climate and human influence on terrestrial landscapes. Canberra: ANU Press.
  9. Jelsma, J. (1999). Room with a view: An excavation in Toe Cave, Ayamaru District, Bird’s Head, Irian Jaya Indonesia. Modern Quaternary Research in Southeast Asia, 15, 41-45.
  10. Kempers, Bernet AJ. (1988). The Kettledrums of Southeast Asia. Rotterdam: A.A Balkema.
  11. Kempers, A.J. Bernet. (1978). Herstel in Eigen Waarde; Monumentenzorg in Indonesie. Amsterdam: De Walburg Pers Zutphen.
  12. Lape, P.V. (2000)a. Contact and Conflict in the Banda Islands, Eastern Indonesia, 11th to 17th Centuries. Rhode Island: Brown University.
  13. Lape, P.V. (2000)b. Political dynamics and religious change in the late pre-colonial Banda Islands, Eastern Indonesia. World Archaeology, 32(1), 138–55.
  14. Lape, P. (2006). Chronology of fortified sites in East Timor. Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology, 1, 285-297.
  15. Lape, P. (2010). Paleoclimates and emergence of fortification in the tropical Pacific islands. Journal of Anthropological Arcaheology, 29(1).
  16. Latinis, D.Kyle and Ken Stark. (1998). Subsistence, Arboriculture and Prehistory in Maluku. Old World Places, New World Problems, 34-65. Canberra: Center for Resources and Enviromental Studies.
  17. Lilley, I. (1992). Papua New Guinea’s Human Past: the Evidence in Archaeology dalam R.D Attenborough dan M.P Alpers (eds.) Human Biology in New Guinea: the Small Cosmos, 150-171. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  18. Mahmud, I. (2009). Pernak-pernik penelitian arkeologi di Papua. Papua, 1(2).
  19. Miedema, J et al. (1997). Perspectives on The Bird’s Head of Irian Jaya, Indonesia. Proceedings of The Conference, Leiden 13-17 Oktober 1997. Amsterdam: Rodopi B.V.
  20. Pasveer, J.M. (1998). Kria cave: an 8000-year occupation sequence from Bird’s Head of Irian Jaya. Modern Quaternary Research in Southeast Asia, 15, 67-89.
  21. Prasetyo, Bagyo. (2009). Perkembangan hasil penelitian arkeologi di Tanah Papua. Seminar Perspektif Budaya Melanesia dan Austronesia dalam Dinamika Kebangsaan dan Pembangunan, dalam rangka Semarak Arkeologi 2009, di Jayapura Papua, 3–4 Juni 2009.
  22. Ririmasse, M. (2005). Jejak dan Prospek Penelitian Arkeologi di Maluku. Kapata Arkeologi, 1(1).
  23. Ririmasse, M. (2007). Fragmen Moko dari Selaru: Temuan Baru Artefak Logam di Maluku. Berita Penelitian Arkeologi, 3(5).
  24. Ririmasse, M. (2008). Visualisasi Tema Perahu dalam Rekayasa Situs Arkeologi di Maluku. Naditira Widya, 2(1).
  25. Ririmasse, M. (2010). Boat Symbolism and Identity in the Insular Southeast Asia: A Case Study from the Southeast Moluccas. Tesis Pascasarjana. Tidak diterbitkan. Leiden: Rijkuniversiteit Leiden.
  27. Ririmasse, M. (2010). Arkeologi Pulau-Pulau Terdepan di Maluku: Sebuah Tinjauan Awal. Kapata Arkeologi, 6(10).
  29. Ririmasse, M. (2011). Koleksi Budaya Bendawi Maluku Tenggara di Museum Etnologi Nasional Leiden. Kalpataru, 20(1).
  30. Sollewijn, Gelpke. (1994). The Report of Miguel Roxo de Brito of his Voyage in 1581-2 to the Raja Ampat, the MacCluer Gulf and Seram. BIjdragen tot de Taal Land en Volkenkunde, 150, 123-145.
  31. Spriggs, M. (1998). Research questions in Maluku archaeology. Cakalele, 9, 49-62.
  32. Spriggs, M. (1997). The Archaeology of the Bird’s Head in it’s Pacific and and Southease Asian Context in.
  33. Spriggs, M. & D. Miller. (1988). A previously unreported bronze kettledrum from the Kai Islands, eastern Indonesia. Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association Bulletin, 8, 79-88.
  34. Starks, Ken, and D. Kyle Latinis. (1992). The Archaeology of Sago Economies in Central Maluku: An initial sketch. Cakalele, 3, 69–86.
  35. Suroto, H. (2010). Prasejarah Papua. Denpasar: Udayana University Press.
  37. Swantoro, P. (2002). Dari Buku ke Buku: Sambung Menyambung Menjadi Satu. Jakarta: KPG Gramedia.
  38. Tanudirdjo, D. (2005). The Dispersal of Austronesian-speaking People and the Ethnogenesis of Indonesian People. Austronesian Diaspora and the Ethnogeneses of People in Indonesian Achipelago. Jakarta: LIPI Press.
  39. Tanudirdjo, D. (2009). Interaksi Austronesia Melanesia: Kajian Interpretasi Teoritis. Seminar Perspektif Budaya Melanesia dan Austronesia dalam Dinamika Kebangsaan dan Pembangunan. Semarak Arkeologi 2009, di Jayapura Papua, 3–4 Juni 2009.
  41. O’Connor, S., Spriggs, M. Veth, P. (2005). The Aru Island in Perspective dalam O’Connor, Sue et.al. The Archaeology of the Aru Island. Canberra: Pandanus Books.